Years ago I was walking across Harvard campus at night looking for Daniel Chester French's statue of John Harvard. I knew that i was close to it....
This is a question that is asked sometimes, recently on another thread, so I thought I’d post my thoughts here, in a separate thread. If I end up...
If you go to the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audie_Murphy_honors_and_awards you will see that Murphy was awarded many more than appear...
If we go into the "How reliable is wikipedia?" discussion here is someone then going to accuse me of hi-jacking the thread? Let's assume "not"...
Sure. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:JD_Vance If you go to any wikiprdia article right under the name of the article there are two links,...
If you want to know what was done and why read about it on the talk page. Also it seems a little odd that you would use a Pakistani newspaper as...
Have you read through the several discussions about this that are on wikipedia?
This is a little odd coming from someone who posts so much scatological stuff, most recently, "Trading Biden for Harris is like crapping your...
To answer your question, in 1980 Hall and Davis got 43,871 thousand votes, but your rebuttal is a classic “Let’s change what we are discussing”...
Oh come on, what about Gus Hall and Angela Davis? Harris and Walz are more radical that them? I don't think so.
This is a good example, assuming Trump did say (write) all this, of why I get unhappy when the anti-Trump folks here feel it is necessary to...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imane_Khelif
Hardly. It was going strong with Rush Limbaugh many years (decades?) ago, who knows when it started but it was not 2015.
What i find so appalling about your posts is not the profanity or proliferation of scatological references, no it's the blatant dishonesty. You...
What we learned all those years ago was that one does not need to be a guy to be a prick.
Wikipedia is not about what someone feels is true but what can be backed up by reliable references.
Sorry but original research is not considered to be an acceptable source.
And did you have a good source for your edit? Where was it?
You appear, to me, to have said two different things, 1." Anyone can create an account and edit as they see fit. " and 2. "content must be...
I see. Have you tried editing wikipedia or are you just repeating internet lore?
Separate names with a comma.
