Mountainview Presentation - Initial observations

After going through the Triarc presentation several times, I thought it may be helpful to share some observations (not criticisms)

My first observation is we should all be thankful for the efforts that have gone into the Mountainview project and recognize there is always a high level of advocacy involved.

Second, for those data hounds like me, I found the presentation easy to understand with one exception. I found myself scratching my head with respect to why actual data was not used with respect to the performing arts groups. The number of performances and the number of attendees is easily obtained. Why was this not included?

Third, it appeared to me that the result of Triarc’s programming work is very similar to what the SAC came up with. The two major exceptions are that the theater will be a new building, and the cost has gone up substantially.

Fourth, it appears that only one group has had their wish list filled and this is where the vast majority of the money will be spent.

Finally, I am urging the board to actively solicit and publish member comments over the next few months. If the vast majority of members (by number) want to spend over $20M on a theater IMHO we should go full speed ahead and never look back. If not, the Board may want to brainstorm with Triarc how to get the biggest bang for the member’s buck.

 

I feel the decsion has been made in favor of the players clubs wants, despite the bulk of the community comments that I have read do not support such a venture. There will not be enough usage to substantiate such an expenditure, with no data to support it either. There has been one group that has had the ear of Triarc, and this is the direction this entire process has gone. I also fear there are supporters on the board that are not going to be objective, but rather vote personal preference over what is best for the community. Lastly, for the cost and location, I again have serious questions about this location over Sundial or new structure at Bell Parking lot? There is still going to be an ongoing issue with Maricopa County and parking which can't be changed due to location and footprint. Where was this addressed in the presentation?
Since putting this to a vote of the community has been overlooked, numerous times, this is the greatest boondoggle created sine the Grand Center. Overspending the PIF with the hope home sales stay on course, placing other projects at risk along the way due to lack of funding, and putting in a built in increase in yearly assessment is what lays at the feet of this action. There have got to be better solutions to this idea. A theater has proven to be a burden to other communities that have built them or purchased them. Example would be Sun City West. The cost to maintain the structure and the indoor needs was too much for the community, so the entire building was sold and it is now a Safeway store. When speaking with other communities that have constructed theaters for their members, now wish they had not, as the cost of maintenance is high. This is based upon a personal conversation with a representative of Robson Communities. They have built one theater, and won't build another.
There is evidence that this type of venue is not needed at Mountainview and is probably not needed at all for the community. TriArc does great work, and I wonder if given full information about opportunities within the community, not just one location, if other possibilities might be suggested.
A community center large enough to hold a visitors center that is open to the publice on business days and at least a Saturday. Have a small theater attached where videos of the history of the community can be viewed along with a presentation why Sun City could be a great place to live with you being here. Make it a great place that welcomes people and makes them feel valued for having spent time there. This is where there is a need, a central location within Sun City, not in the far reaches of Sun City. In my opinion.

 

And do what with Mountain View Carole? Remodel the pool and leave all the dumpy old buildings? Put lipstick on the pig and stucco them? How quickly do you think we can shift gears and create this theater/community center/visitor center at Bell? I'll be generous and say three years, in all likelihood closer to 4 years. Then there's the bigger/better questions: Is this what the members want? What will that cost be?

My understanding from those who have been proponents of a "master plan" is that they are interested in better deciding what our future needs are. We should have had one years ago, we didn't. Now telling folks at MV to wait longer is a non-starter for me. Telling the performance groups they are unwanted and not needed is also an ugly look for our community.