I'm confused; help me out here Dave W.

Makes you wonder what numbers they were concerned about giving her?

 

Bill,

I hope you are willing to ask the tough question of AB/TF - What information did you request that was not given to you? Next exchange - October 13 I think. I should also note that I asked CN for the utilization data she sent to Triarc and she blew me off by not responding. Oh well - Deja Vu all over again.

 

FYI - I can only go from what was in the board packet I picked up and her bio was much thinner than what you described. Can you tell me the source of the information you quoted? I am very confused. Thanks, John

 

John,
RCSC newsletters and Sun City Independent, Oct. 23, 2024 edition, published information about all the candidates. Here’s Anita’s:

Anita Borski

Borski was the director of Revenue, Liability and Parking at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, a representative on the Faculty/Staff Senate Governance Committee, a member of National Association of University Business Officers, and board member of Minnesota Collection Network (a professional financial network).

She worked in automated system design, testing and production of university financial applications and received her Bachelor’s degree from the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point in communication, public relations and corporate communication.

She is the Sun City Foundation vice president and serves on the Club Organization and Finance, Budget and Audit committees. She is also the community assistance and Sun City museum liaison. She is a member of the Fairway Knitters Club.

Her goals include to expand the Foundation to allow acceptance of federal, state and local grant dollars and continue to assist the most needy residents, continue to complete deferred maintenance items, continue to upgrade technology, require strong financial management, support RCSC clubs with solid financial advice and organizational structure and encourage members to take an active role in the governance process.

 

It was from the Flyers the RCSC puts out every year that shows the list of each candidate and their resume'.

 

That utilization data is included in the triArc presentation just posted online John. It's interesting and really telling.

I have the B and F meeting on my calendar but i have little interest in attending three meetings over three consecutive days. Going to the Mountain View meeting on Tuesday night and the outreach committee meeting on Thursday. As a visitor to the B&F meeting on Weds i would be in an awkward position asking that question. That said, every member of that committee should want to know what Anita has requested and failed to receive?

Hopefully the question is asked, or the board president explains why he felt he had the right to hold anything back from the treasurer, or any other board member for that matter.

 

Thanks Tom - I only had the summary of board candidates in front of me.

 

Bill where would I look to find the Triarc presentation posted online - It is not in the Mountainview project section.

 

ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ5zEBM4TkQ

 

What I read of Anita Borski and her outstanding qualifications, I dont feel it prudent to be questioning her abilities. It is clear she is well qualified for the position and should have not aspersions cast on her abilities and knowledge. Her resume reveals a significant career and we are honored she has chosed to continue to offer her service to the RCSC and the Foundation. She has not made a single comment about what has occurred, therefore, until one hears from Anita herself, it is best to keep the sidetalk and specualtion to a minimum. Anita is a person of great integrity and deserves to be treated with respect, period.

There is a third party making allegations. It is up to that person to clarify and provide substance to the allegations made and I suspect this will all shke out in the boardroom, not in front of the viweing public. Providing any additional guesswork as to the actions of others is lunacy, unless you have the proof to substantiate any allegations.

For the sake of all involved, can we please leave the attacks on any board members, past or present, on the wayside? These are good people that need time to get their center again and move forward with the busines of the RCSC. It is the most reasonable thing to do, in my opinion.

 

Personally I wish the questions about the situation were addressed and answered.

 

So you know what happened in the executive session, what the issues were, what the discussions entailed. I highly doubt it so you are blowing smoke out an orfice, as usual.