SC Stores Included - Kroger releases list of 101 Albertsons, Safeway it plans to off load

The point is still anyone can edit. I have. Is English your second language?

 

And did you have a good source for your edit? Where was it?

 

It was 'Is a small penis directly related to a large ego and NPD'? Answer was yes according to my research, many psychologists sourced.

 

Sorry but original research is not considered to be an acceptable source.

 

Sorry but it doesn't make it less true, does it? Another truth which probably originated eons ago among a group of boys somewhere on the planet is if you act like a little prick, you will be treated like one.

 

Wikipedia is not about what someone feels is true but what can be backed up by reliable references.

 

What we learned all those years ago was that one does not need to be a guy to be a prick.

 

Not true. You can cut things off, add things but those pesky little x y chromosomes are there forever. You all just want to prove your 'prickliness' by berating women, showing off your self perceived intelligence. Unlike the dude who punched the girl at the Olympics who needs the physical abuse to feel superior, there are a few here who need to verbally abuse to feel like the big boys.

Wish I could say it's been fun.

 

Let's face it, those transgender, so called, athelets are losers who can't compete and win against their own gender, so they pick on the weaker sex.

They're still losers!

 

From the actual "Wikipedia"

https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source#:~:text=Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on,in progress, or simply incorrect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_Wikipedia_is_not_so_great

 

Wiki itself says this is BS. So I am guessing your trash can is full of crap.

 

What i find so appalling about your posts is not the profanity or proliferation of scatological references, no it's the blatant dishonesty. You post that "Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere" failing to complete the whole quote which is, "Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia." which is to say that you can't use wikipedia as a source for something on wikipedia. This is because an entity can not use its self as a source in any discussion, posting or whatever. Britannica can not use Britannica as a reference. if you make a claim, you can't use yourself as the source. I am always amazed at people who think that they have won an argument when they do so by not being honest.

 

WOW!!!!! What does that even mean? You serve up a better word salad than Kamala.



EXACTLY where did I say this? "You post that "Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere". I won't say you are blatantly dishonest, you flat out lie Einar. Wiki is NOT a reliable source period. You will argue for any left wing source.

https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what’s-wrong-wikipedia

https://www.technologyreview.com/2013/10/22/175674/the-decline-of-wikipedia/

https://www.makeuseof.com/why-wikipedia-not-as-credible-you-think/

 

Wiki is such a BS site.

https://www.shorenewsnetwork.com/2024/08/11/wikipedia-deletes-j-d-vances-wartime-medals-and-awards/

 

Have you read through the several discussions about this that are on wikipedia?

 

Yup. Point being who gets to change info???

 

Wikipedia scrubs JD Vance’s military honors, sparking bias controversy (tribune.com.pk)

 

If you want to know what was done and why read about it on the talk page. Also it seems a little odd that you would use a Pakistani newspaper as your source.

 

PROVES MY POINT WIKI IS BS

 

Carptrash - Link please on the talk page.

HH- Who cares what they scrubbed?