Latest Court Lawsuit Update

Discussion in 'Sun City General Discussions' started by admin, Jul 14, 2019.

  1. carptrash

    carptrash Well-Known Member

    So does "go back a few steps" begin with some new Board members?
     
  2. admin

    admin Administrator Staff Member

    Yes Carp, as well as a new GM versed and willing to work within the framework to Title 33, and understands members are a benefit not a liability to be silenced.
     
  3. carptrash

    carptrash Well-Known Member

    We'll talk.
     
  4. aggie

    aggie Well-Known Member

    So did anyone go to the court proceedings yesterday or hear how it went?
     
  5. carptrash

    carptrash Well-Known Member

    No, missed that it was happening. I await news.
     
  6. admin

    admin Administrator Staff Member

    No new entries to speak of about the hearing, but there is a one liner entered that may be of interest. " DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF POSITION REGARDING RETROACTIVITY ISSUE" I would surmise the judge is making an ruling about title 33, and making it retroactive. No, I was not in court, just guessing at what the latest motion, filed on the 23rd of August could mean.
     
  7. BPearson

    BPearson Well-Known Member

    It should be fascinating to watch and see if this judge is an old style hanging one who is looking for his pound of flesh or if he is enlightened enough to let a by-gone truly be a by-gone.
     
  8. aggie

    aggie Well-Known Member

    There are minutes posted from the hearing that seem to indicate that there is some movement. The court wants to hear from both parties on the partial summary judgement and also the effect of the law that was passed in relation to Title 10 status. We should know more in a few weeks.
     
    carptrash likes this.
  9. carptrash

    carptrash Well-Known Member

    You all know the saying, "The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine. "
    So we can be pretty sure about the first part,
    not so sure about the second part.
     
  10. admin

    admin Administrator Staff Member

    Was just reading the "notices" under the Superior Court Page and there appears to be some interest by the court in both S.B. 1094 and "DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF POSITION REGARDING RETROACTIVITY ISSUE". It would appear to the this reader the Title 10/33 has become an issue in the hearings. Just my observation, nothing in the notes or case history to indicate anything concrete.
     

Share This Page